Alaskas neighborhoods vary widely in their vibrancy and livability factors.
These metrics provide a multi-dimensional view of what makes a neighborhood dynamic and accessible.
This is not subjective opinion but data-driven analysis of Alaskas least vibrant areas.
Home Stratosphere | Leaflet
It features moderate urban sophistication (41.13) and a fair young singles population (43.88).
The neighborhood has low ratings for hip & trendy (8.34) and walkability (2.70).
The young singles population is moderate (38.59).
The neighborhood is very car-friendly (75.97) but has poor walkability (1.62).
The young singles population is moderate-to-low (35.65).
The neighborhood is quite car-friendly (69.73) but has very poor walkability (1.12).
The young singles population is moderate (46.24).
The neighborhood is very car-friendly (79.70) and has a moderate young singles population (44.87).
The neighborhood is very car-friendly (76.35) but has poor walkability (3.42).
The young singles metric is moderate (39.93).
The neighborhood does have a good young singles population (51.16) and is quite car-friendly (69.25).
The neighborhood is very car-friendly (73.87) but suffers from poor walkability (2.86).
This suggests that while the area has appealing characteristics, lack of walkability significantly impacts its overall vibrancy.
However, the neighborhood is extremely car-friendly (85.62), suggesting a suburban or rural character.
The young singles population is relatively low (31.31).
The neighborhood scores extremely low on hip & trendy (1.81) and walkability (2.01).
The young singles metric (33.72) indicates a relatively low presence of younger residents.
The young singles population is moderate (36.30).
The young singles metric (40.30) suggests a moderate presence of younger residents.
The neighborhood does have moderate urban sophistication (54.73) and is relatively car-friendly (68.51).
The young singles metric (46.14) suggests a moderate presence of younger residents despite the areas low vibrancy.
This area is relatively car-friendly (66.57) but has extremely poor walkability (1.81).
The low vibrancy score despite some strong metrics suggests other factors may be negatively impacting the neighborhoods overall livability.
Even its car-friendliness is relatively low at 12.27, suggesting limited transportation options overall.
The neighborhoods near-zero vibrancy score makes it Alaskas least lively area by a significant margin.
